[Headcanon] Names

[tungstenTinkerer]

Trying to make a little bit of order here.

This are the words I am using. Of course I believe it's something that different players may use differently but this is what I think are the names accepted in the community.

the ASPECT is what everyone thinks it is (i.e. Breath, Life)
the CLASS is the active/passive pair (i.e. explorator, tactician)
the TITLE is one of the two things in a class (i.e. Scout, Sage)
the ROLE is the full player description (i.e. Scout of Breath, Sage of Life)

DO you have different headcanons?

[genesisArtificer]

Yeah, I use Class and Title intechangeably. For passive/active pair I use CLASSES (example: Tactician Classes). Other sound fine to me.

[whiteLimestone]

I use Title for both Role and Class sometimes.

[timelyTurnabout]

I'm the same as the above two

For me:
Aspect always = second descriptor ("Breath")
Role always = full descriptor ("Heir of Breath")
Class may = full descriptor "Heir of Breath", or possibly just the first ("Heir"), or the active/passive pair ("Tactician")
i.e. "If you're an active class...", "If you are a Tactician class...", "This may change depending on your class, for example, and Heir of Breath may..."
Title may = full descriptor "Heir of Breath", or possibly just the first ("Heir")

[tungstenTinkerer]

That's rather unique, I thought almost everybody accepted "aspect" as the second part of the title...

[timelyTurnabout]

GAH. I somehow managed to post everything just about backwards.
No, I basically meant to say I agreed with all of the above.